12/21/17

Neil Degrasse Tyson Needs to Knock It Off







Watch it.  Watch it again.


I know that many of those coming to this article are on a different page than me on this issue.  Many of you may have chuckled at a screen-cap of a NDT tweet once or twice.  I cannot say that I haven't enjoyed some of NDT's attempts at hipness and humor.  I liked "Cosmos", for what it's worth.  If you are a NDT fan, what you are about to read might upset you. But among readers of this article you are the most important of all-- the kind that need to be brought out of the darkness of ignorance and into the harsh, all-telling light.  Please bear with me, even if the video you just viewed above genuinely entertained you.


To get right to the meat of this issue:
Neil Degrasse Tyson, you need to stop it.  Knock it off.

You have been making clumsy attempts at mainstream appeal, tweeting snarky half-baked comments about pop culture's "ignorance" of science, and generally acting like a 50+ year old person who doesn't understand youth culture but spends an cringingly large amount of time trying to be hip.

All of which would be fine in my book, because I don't care.  These things do not affect me, because I do not have to pay attention.

But then you went and fucked with our Pitchfork Over/Unders, and you crossed a line.  Pitchfork Over/Unders are a fine, reputable, beloved institution of the pop-music-related clickbait-level youtube content scene, and you not only got on one despite not being a musician, but you turned in one of the shittiest episodes to date. 

As far as my extensive research is concerned, Eric Andre is the only other non-musician that has been on an Over/Under, and that isn't a problem because Eric Andre is funny and entertaining.  In fact, most Over/Unders are funny and entertaining, because being funny and entertaining in a Pitchfork Over/Under interview is easy as fuck.  You just stay in your lane and give stupid answers, and don't try too hard.  There's a staff of people at Pitchfork who are going to edit that shit up right and make you look as funny as they can.  There's not gonna give you hardball questions.  They're gonna ask you if you like peanut butter, and you say 'yeah peanut butter is the shit' or 'nah fam fuck peanut butter that shit kills people with peanut allergies' and that's it.  Hilarious!  If you really want to go for it, and are genuinely a funny person, you can go all out and maybe you'll turn in classic episode like Vince Staples or Neon Indian.  But Over/Unders are at baseline moderately entertaining because the formula is simple and fun, and doesn't demand much of the artist themselves.  Yet NDT managed to fuck it up.  Some shit just cannot be salvaged by clever editing.  A rundown of Neil Degrasse Tyson's Over/Under:

- When prompted by "Miss Universe", starts a cringy, hammy rant about how it should be "Miss Earth" instead of Miss Universe.  He drops a "I study the universe" and also a "c'mon now" because apparently he's Jerry Seinfeld now.

- Drones on about his tie collection.  Discusses how he is above wearing Star Trek ties.  

- Does a riff about how small earth is relative to the universe because we didn't know that already.

- Discusses how heavy cream floats on skim milk because it is "lighter", which is literally incorrect and something we all learned not to say if we paid attention in high school physics.  Heavy cream floats on skim milk because it's less dense you hack.

- Ends his incorrect explanation of buoyancy by slowly, ceremoniously opining "the physics.... will set you free", because apparently he's John 8:32 now.

- Discusses the work of GZA in a extremely vague, circumspect way.  His odd, conceptual rambling implies that he has listened to the Wu-Tang Clan before, but in no way confirms that he has listened to the Wu-Tang Clan before.

- Rants about how Mars bars are called Mars bars. "I'm takin' the planet", he says.  I'm taking the planet he says! Can you believe this guy???

- Continues to ham it up, fake-ranting about all the candy, gum, and other products that have stellar names because this is an urgent socio-political issue in his mind.

- Launches into extremely extended, poorly told story.  Too much context is provided, stalling the whole thing before it begins.  Makes sure to mention he was in "REALLY" good shape at the time.  The story is about how he needed more money in grad school so his friend invited him to be a male stripper and he said no.  It's a classically structured bad story, the kind that teases the listener with the prospect of something interesting happening, but then ends with the interesting thing not happening, and you realize there was never any possibility of the proposed interesting thing ever happening, and you feel cheated.

- Plugs his book.

- Says "we're stardust".  Whoa dude.  Claims that this is the most underrated fact in the universe, like a dumbass.

So that's it.  I hope my opinion-drenched commentary on this video has effectively conveyed my opinion on this guy.  The guy just tries too hard.  He is old, and he has a PhD, and that fundamentally means he's not going to be a very hip person, but he tries anyway.  Furthermore, his take on popular science can be such a shtick.  His snarky, pointless whining about how society appropriates astronomical terms is very representative of the kind of stuff that he posts on twitter.  I am a subscriber to a subreddit called r/iamverysmart, dedicated to posting screenshots of faux-intellectual internet posturing, and they had to ban posting his tweets because all anyone posted on there was his tweets.

I have no doubt that Neil Degrasse Tyson is extremely smart, and I like him as a guy who pops up in interviews in popular science documentaries.  But it needs to be said: his forays into establishing himself as an likable, charismatic entertainer really, really suck.  He is bad at being interesting and likable as a person when he is not talking about quasars.  

As I said at the start, all of this would have been a non-issue, and beyond the scope of a Sad Moth rant-piece if he hadn't went and fucked around with the lovely, inimitable Pitchfork Over/Under youtube series.  

But he did, and here were are.

Knock it off, Neil Degrasse Tyson.

10/15/17

Sad Moth Picks a New National Anthem

There's been a lot of discussion of the national anthem in the news lately.  While all of this discourse will continue to keep websites such as facebook.com and twitter.com in business, and any thing said on a measly little music blog such as Sad Moth Music will amount to little more than a whisper in a room full of yells, we here at Sad Moth think it is important to bring our perspective to the issue.

Our main thesis is this:  whatever you think about the national anthem and its symbology, the song FUCKING SUCKS.  But that's not really Thomas Jefferson (or whoever wrote the song)'s fault.  Most old music is boring and lame.  Anyone with a dad knows that.  The national anthem is no different.  It's corny, drawn out, boring, with few original ideas.  It does nothing that wasn't done better, by more influential artists.  It's a 3/10 track at best.

So, what are we getting at?  We need a new national anthem.  Something fresh, something hip, something catchy.  A good anthem is short, about a minute and a half, and it should be simple and recognizable.  Furthermore, as the anthem is so often performed at large sporting events and other large, outdoor events, the anthem should sound good being blasted out of old PA speakers.  It should not be rendered unrecognizable as it echoes of the walls of a massive football stadium, or wafts over the heads of thousands at 4th of July fireworks show.

After weeks of vetting and debate at the Sad Moth offices, we winnowed the candidates for the new national anthem down to six great, timeless songs.  We then produced video simulations for each of the six songs, which can be found below.  These video simulations aim to emulate the tone that each song will set.  The audio for each song has also been altered.  Reverb, echo, and low pass filters have been added to suggest what the songs will sound like in the settings the videos display.  Watch each video thoroughly, and at the end, we will throw up a poll to let the Sad Moth readership decide which song is most fit to be the new national anthem.

10/3/17

Sad Moth 1 Year Anniversary Reviews: Bon Iver -- 22, A Million

Editor's Note: 22, A Million was released by seminal American recording artist Bon Iver (aka Justin Vernon) 1 year (and two days) ago.  In an impressive display of procrastination, lethargy, and general disinterest, the Sad Moth stable of record reviewers have taken a FULL YEAR to finish their reviews, which were originally planned to be published shortly after the record release.  But, ultimately, they pulled it out of their ass.  What you will find below are four reviews.  If you genuinely loved this album, we are sorry.  If you share our extremely shallow, overly-ironic perspective on the music of Bon Iver, we hope you will enjoy.  If you are Justin Vernon, don't get it twisted: you better not show your face around these parts for a long, long time to come.

Reviews By:

Manny                     

                                          /10


Go To Review >>>>

Noah                       6/10
Go To Review >>>>

Patrick                    6.9/10
Go To Review >>>>

Justin V.                 ∞/10

Aggregate Score: 8=====/10

22 a million: A review in poetry by Justin V.


22 a million

a poetic record review of Bon Iver's magnum opus


by Justin V.


22, A Million

Bon Iver's 22, A Million is an experimentation into glitchy transcendence. The album, with various successes, uses audio impurity to set an ambient for Justin Vernon's (Bon Iver's) raw and honest journey to self actualization. It is an album about seeking truth, hyper accepting imperfection, dealing with existence, and reflecting on the past...

22 a million? More like 1,000,000 a trillion!

Editor's Note:  This review was written a while ago -- like, over a year ago.  The author has chosen not edit it for its publication today, as he finds it to be a bit of a time capsule, if you will, to a pre-2017 world.  The innocence that can be read between each line proved too wholesome to alter.  2016 was a simpler time. A better time.  And back in 2016, Justin Vernon dropped 22 a million on us.  Here is what our intrepid Sad Moth reporter wrote:


O'l Pat's 22 A Million Review

Artist: Bon Iver
Album: 22,  A Million (2016)

It's been about a year now since we as Sad Moth were originally going to publish our Bon Iver 22, A Million reviews.  His latest record, released after about a half decade album drought, polarized many a fan but didn't stop the thing for garnering rave reviews, as most Justin Vernon projects seem to do.  I seem to be having a difficult time trying to discern what side of the fence I'm on, with not only this album but Bon Iver as a whole. 

8/15/17

Hero Blogger Puts on Festival, Saves Music

Crowds flock to see their hero, the internet blogger
who saved music with one last, big show.
No one saw Sad Moth 2 coming, but it's revelatory significance has already been trumpeted by a legion of music critics.  "History will note that there was music before Sad Moth 2, and there was music after Sad Moth 2," wrote Chuck Klosterman, "nothing will ever be the same."  Pitchfork Music noted, "much like other legendary festivals, such as Woodstock or Woodstock '99, Sad Moth 2 marked a cultural paradigm shift.  We are entering a new epoch; completely uncharted waters.  Sad Moth 2 not only changed music for ever, but it saved it too."

But how did this happen?  The answer lies within the genius of one man.  "You know me, I don't like to toot my own horn or anything," the humble internet blogger who organized Sad Moth 2 opines over martinis during an exclusive interview. "I'll accept the credit if credit is to be given.  But a lot of other great people helped, in minor ways.  Was it my idea? Yes.  Did I plan everything? Yes. Did I run everything? Yes.  But I'm too humble to rest on my laurels. I'm already thinking about next year."

After the immense success of Sad Moth 2, the internet blogger has found it difficult to go out in public without being inundated by autograph seekers, frenzied children, penitent hordes of cultish worshippers and buxom harlots propositioning him for sex.  "I try and not let it get to my head," he says while sipping from a jewel-encrusted chalice gifted to him by the King of Spain.  "I put on my pants one leg at a time just like everyone else, you know."

For those who've been living under a rock the past couple days, Sad Moth 2: Electric Boogaloo was a music festival held on the grounds of scenic Festge Park in Cross Plains, Wisconsin.  The event is in its second year, though last year's fest was not nearly as successful.  "I think it's because I gave too much responsibility to other people," offers the internet blogger, "Sad Moth Music Fest is best when it is more the product of a singular creative voice.  Like y'know... mine."

I ask him to elucidate what he means by "singular creative voice."  He smiles, leans back in his chair and flips down his super awesome sunglasses with the hinged lenses.  "Well, you see, as someone who appreciates the classics, and understands that most music today is shallow, boring trash, sometimes I feel like I was born in the wrong generation.  I wanted to put something on, one big fest that would save today's music from itself.  It took a lot of hard work.  I really had to do like, a couple hours of work, send a bunch of texts and stuff.  But I think all my hard work really paid off.  People really responded to my fest in a positive way.  I mean, I've always had an outstanding taste in music, but come on!  Sometimes I feel like I've been getting too much praise, if that's even possible!"

The internet blogger has had a grueling schedule in the last few days, jetting across the globe to receive congratulatory gifts from world leaders.  "It's been tough, seeing the world, flying first class,  hearing all these world dignitaries tell me how great I am," he says, flashing his million-dollar smile. "Welp, catch ya on the flipside."  He rises and hits me with the double finger guns.  What a great guy.

4/14/17

3/26/17

Sad Moth Podcast Episode 2: We Back Boiiiii: Hopefully This Works Special Edition

Last post didn't seem to work on podcasting platforms, I think because the file was in wav, not mp3.  Hopefully this works!


1/13/17

Sad Moth vs. The Corporate Monolith: The Pitchfork Hatepost

As all of you loyal Sad Moth readers are aware, we here at Sad Moth have recently rolled out a new video-essay series known as "Sad Moth Musical Knowledge".  It is a work in progress, I know, but I think it's really taking off.  I mean just look at these pageviews for the last week!

I was being sarcastic just now.  No one reads this blog.  Even people who write for this blog don't read this blog.  So that makes what I'm about to tell you even more fucking stupid.


Pitchfork slapped us with a fucking copyright claim.

Now I know what you're gonna say. "But Sad Moth... you're videos are literally just you rambling over Pitchfork video essays with the sound taken out."

Listen.  This isn't about who's "legally justified" in this situation.  This isn't about "copyright law".  This is about me being mad.  This is about a corporate behemoth trying to crush a threatening upstart under their thumb.  This is about scrappy, independent Sad Moth Music going rogue when the chips are down.

First of all, you may notice Pitchfork is mentioned nowhere in the above screenshot.  That is because Pitchfork is owned by a faceless, odious media conglomerate known as "Condé Nast".  A quick look at their website shows that this company also owns Vogue, GQ, The New Yorker, Wired, Vanity Fair, and many other media institutions.  Let's hate-watch one of their youtube videos, shall we?


So essentially what we're getting here is a bunch of obnoxious, thick-framed glasses wearing yuppie fucks who think their art degrees from NYU give them license to spout vague axioms about creativity while some garbage EDM plays in the background.  I hope every one of these people die in a painful Adobe Lightroom editing accident.

To get back on topic, these are the people who think they can tell me what's satire?  These are the people that think they can tell me my video doesn't fall under the protection of fair use?  In an effort to make myself even more angry, I choose to believe that these two people specifically are the ones who ordered for Sad Moth Musical Knowledge Ep. 1 to be taken down:


God, just look at those smug, shit eating grins.  The one on the right looks like he just tried out an ironic mustache but gave it up because someone make a passive-agressive comment about it.  The one on the left obviously listens to too much Ingrid Michaelson for her own good.  Neither are self-aware in any meaningful way.  Fuck these people.  When Sad Moth usurps the corporate overlords of the music journalism industry, we will make sure to hire both these people, wait until they sign expensive leases on apartments in their favorite gentrified city, then fire them both out of pure spite. 

Ultimately, this grim episode in Sad Moth history only goes to further confirm one of our core beliefs: Pitchfork Media is so 2000-and-late.  I think it can be conclusively said that this video takedown was many things: a bitch move, a mondo buzzkill, super weak, and overall just totally lamesauce.  You're just not making those kind of allegations about circa-2004 Pitchfork.  But this is 2016. Pitchfork is owned by a massive media conglomerate.  You messed with the wrong hombres, Pitchfork.  You're pathetic.  Your time has passed.

You're pretty much Rolling Stone at this point.

1/2/17

Sad Moth Podcast Ep. 2: The Digimon: The Movie vs. Shrek Supa Dupa Showdown

Sad Moth Manny, Noah, and special guest Nathan are all up in it with a track for track evaluation of two of the most influential albums of all time -- the Digimon: The Movie and Shrek soundtracks.  But which one is better????  We weren't sure either, but we each ranked all of the tracks from first to last, and figured it out!  Who won?  I dunno, you gotta LISTEN to it nerds!
vs.


Here's the link to the poll we used throughout the episode. We highly encourage you to take it as well!